When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is confined in Daegu prison and has neglected that he was normal organized violence B, and the victim C(37 years of age) is a person who was confined in Daegu prison and output it as a private cleaning unit.

At around 10:00 on November 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to laundry in the Daegu Prison D, Daegu-gun Sslock 2624, Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, but the victim refused to do so, and (b) the victim refused to do so; (c) and (d) the victim “I am shot and pacta, pacta, pacta, pacta, and a similar shot. I am am humbling. I am am humbling. I am humbling.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to witness E, F, and G’s respective legal statements E, F, and G’s written statement of each police officer’s statement, and report on the investigation results [ although the accused and the defense counsel denies the intimidation itself, the facts charged in the instant case are fully convicted in full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecution and the results

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act: Fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;