When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 3, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict in the Seogu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on October, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 11, 2016.

The defendant is a person who has been awarded a sub-subcontract for the construction of structures from the construction of optical leather Co., Ltd., a sub-contractor for high-speed national highways E construction projects.

1. On December 2012, the Defendant came to know that it was difficult for the Defendant to prepare soil and sand treatment facilities arising in the process of the above tunnel construction project, etc., which was subcontracted to F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), and H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”), a public official in charge of Seongdong-si to obtain permission for development activities related to mushroom farming, etc., on the part of F and H, and on the part of F and H, he/she may embling sand on the site of the land located in Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, G, who was awarded a subcontract to G from F. (hereinafter “H”).

“Along with the fact that the Plaintiff was aware.”

On October 2013, the Defendant would assist the H’s head I and the JJ of the F site of H in order to obtain a permit to build mushroom growing a mushroom growing construction permit for the 18 parcels, which was developed from F as a site for a private soil treatment plant, from the G in Sung-gun, Gyeong-gun, and 18 parcels.

The phrase “one hundred million won is changed under the name of guard, public official in charge, street expenses, etc.”, and the said I received KRW 50 million from the said I to the account in the name of the Defendant’s child around November 6, 2013, KRW 20 million in cash from the multilateral bank located around December 26, 2013, KRW 18.5 million in cash from the said account around January 28, 2014, and KRW 11.5 million from the said account around January 29, 2014, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 11857, Jan. 29, 2014>

On November 6, 2013, the account transfer was made through the account in Q’s name. On January 28, 2014 and January 29, 2014, the account transfer was made through the account in the name of R to the account in the name of the Defendant’s ID.

As a result, the Defendant received money of KRW 100 million under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials.

2. On November 9, 2013, the Defendant offered a bribe to P, who is the chief of the U.S. U.S. office in the N in Daegu Northern-gu M, Daegu-gu P, the Defendant “paragraph 1.”