However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was physically handicapped who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions; and (b) was able to collect ‘wel' (17cm wide, 12cm long) which is a dangerous object on the floor of the chemical, while taking trial expenses with respect to the act of ringing with the victim C in the Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Sinpo-ro, Mapo-ro, and caused the victim's injury that the victim got out of the math of treatment days after getting off one time on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs and certificates of persons with disabilities;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical drugs;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Fully considering the following circumstances: (a) there is a mental retardation disorder of the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) there is only three minor fines; (c) the victim appears to have caused the crime; (d) the damage is relatively minor; and (e) the mother of the defendant is well aware of the defendant in order to prevent recurrence;