However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 3, 2018, around 14:10 on March 3, 2018, the Defendant arrived at this destination of the victim D (57 tax) (57) who was the above taxi engineer while he was unclaimed from the taxi in front of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

For the sake of the victim, “the victim was known,”

Chewing typium, when she gets off from the vehicle, she went beyond the victim's eye due to drinking, and continued to see the victim's her sensium, etc., she laid down the body of the right side and the floor in need of about 6 weeks of treatment period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate of injury);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] of category 1 (6-2 years) in the aggravated area (6-2 years) [the person subject to special aggravation] / [the decision of sentencing] of the crime of this case, the circumstance and contents of the crime of this case, the degree and part of the injury, the victim's payment of reasonable money to the victim, and thus the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant, the recognition of the crime and reflects the fact that the injured person is recognized, the first offender is the defendant, and all other circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant shown in the arguments such as age, career, health status, family relation, etc.