손해배상(기)
1. The Defendants each of the Plaintiffs A, B, C, D, and F was 48,305,558 won, Plaintiff G, and H respectively, and each of the said money.
1. Basic facts
A. The parties’ status relationship and status 1) The Defendant Han-friendly Information and Communications Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”).
(2) In order to carry out the said construction, the Defendant Company entered into an employment contract with the network L (hereinafter “the network”) on December 6, 201, which is the main unit of electric power distribution, from December 6, 201 to December 30, 201, with the daily wage rate of KRW 250,000,000. On the same day, the Defendant Company entered into an employment contract with I who is the owner of the vehicle M 4.5 tons of truck (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and the owner of the vehicle M 4.5 tons of the same day from December 6, 201 to December 30, 201, with the wage rate of KRW 50,000 (including the wage rate of KRW 50,000).
3) The Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, and F are brothers and sisters of the deceased, who have succeeded to the deceased’s properties each of one-seven shares, and the Plaintiff G and H are married with the deceased’s children, who have succeeded to the deceased’s properties each of 1/14 shares of each of the 1/14 shares, as the deceased’s children. The Defendant joining the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Defendant I, which guarantees liability for damages caused by the operation of the instant vehicle, as to the instant vehicle.
B. (1) Defendant I received the order of the Defendant Company to transport the electric drum to the place of work, and around 08:30 on December 29, 201, Defendant J had Defendant J, who was employed as a daily worker in the Defendant Company, carry one electric drum on the loading of the instant vehicle, and let Defendant J drive the instant vehicle at the P entrance in the Gyeongbuk-do, U.S., working place, and let Defendant J go to prevent the front part of the instant vehicle from getting off. (2) Defendant J sent other employees of the Defendant Company to the direction of preventing the front part of the instant vehicle by driving the instant vehicle at the workplace where the instant vehicle is located.