2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

1. At around 01:15 on January 27, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the cafeteria “C” restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim by publicly bing “A” who is an employee of the victim belonging to the Daegu Jung-gu Police Station Edistrict, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of his/her face at one time, and received the report of his/her face at one time, and three other customers are heard.

2. While the Defendant attempted to go out of the same place without disclosing personal information, the Defendant obstructed legitimate execution of duties regarding the crime prevention and suppression of police officials for about 10 minutes, including, but not limited to, the time and place of performance of duties of the instant G’s hand, with the intent to put up the Defendant in mind, “I would like to go out of this spacks, one beam, spacks, spacks, and die.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Selection of each of the selective fines (i.e., reflectability of a fine, long-term fine and no other three times, if any);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.