When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2020. 7. 26. 06:28 경 울산 남구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 간판 집 앞 노상에 떨어져 있던 피해자 D( 여, 30세) 의 시가 130,000원 상당의 오렌지색 노 스페이스 힙 색( 가방) 1개, 그 힙 색 안에 들어 있던 시가 90,000원 상당의 지갑 형 태의 루 이비 통 파우치 형 핸드폰 케이스( 가품) 1개, 그 핸드폰 케이스 안에 있던

50,000 won 1, 10,00 won 2, 10,000 won 2, 10,000 10,000 2, 1 resident registration certificate, 1, 1, Kakao Bank Cze Card, 1, 1,00 3, and 1,000 Samsung Card.

피고 인은 위 피해자의 힙 색( 가방) 과 그 안에 들어 있던 내용물 등 도합 300,000원 상당을 피해자에게 반환하는 등 필요한 절차를 밟지 아니한 채 자신이 가질 생각으로 가지고 가 횡령하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes 10 to four copies of the defendant's legal statement E, written statements D, four copies of a site photograph, four copies of a CCTV photograph, and ten copies of a CCTV photograph;

1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The amount of fines imposed by the summary order for the reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act cannot be deemed to be excessive as determined by comprehensively taking account of all the conditions of sentencing, including the value of the damaged goods, the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the criminal records of the Defendant, and the balance of sentencing with similar cases. Since there is no change of circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the notification of the summary order, the amount of fines determined by the summary order shall be maintained as they are, and it