beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.14 2015나68804

부당이득금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. This part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that "this court" in Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the court of first instance", "the date of pronouncement of this judgment" in Part 10 shall be "the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance", "the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance" in Part 10 shall be "the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance", and Parts 7, 16 through 8, 10 shall be identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the

【(C) The portion of the land in this case, with the exception of the part indicated in the table (attached Form No. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15; hereinafter “Attachment No. 301”) of the land in this case, giving up the right to use and benefit from the land should be recognized as an important disposal act giving up the core rights of ownership. It is difficult to conclude that the owner of the land in this case’s exclusive use of and benefit from the land in this case’s portion other than the part indicated in the table (attached Form No. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15). However, it is difficult to conclude that the owner of the land in this case’s exclusive use of and benefit from the land in this case’s portion (excluding the remaining portion of the land.