2.However, the above imprisonment without prison labor shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Cbea cruise vehicle.

On January 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on January 16:31, 201, and proceeded along the four-lane way in front of the Hando Village in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, with the central park protection area from the Roman to the two-lane of the road.

At the same time, there was an intersection where signal apparatus was installed, so that the driver engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and keeping the front door well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving while driving a stroke, and received respectively the right side of the E vehicle driven by the victim D and the right side part of the G vehicle driven by the victim F as the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim D, in accordance with normal signal, from the horizontal distance of the mast village, due to the negligence while driving the stroke while driving the stroke.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the above D, the injury to the victim H in the above D, such as cage cage cages, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, the injury to the brain cages requiring approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim I, the injury to the cage cage cages, etc. requiring approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment to the victim J, and the injury to the cage cages and tensions requiring approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim J, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each statement of D, F, and K;

3. A traffic accident report (1) (2).

4. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against the Victim J who is the most severe offense).

3. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

4. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution