1. Defendant A is the C site director of a construction company.

A person who runs a business generating fugitive dust shall install facilities to control the generation of fugitive dust or take necessary measures.

Nevertheless, on July 6, 2017, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to control fugitive dust, such as having transportation vehicles operate without taking measures to kill three wheels and side water, at the above construction site located in Busan Metropolitan captain-gun D around July 6, 2017.

2. Defendant A is a corporation established for the purpose of civil engineering and construction work business.

The defendant did not take necessary measures to suppress fugitive dust as above in relation to the defendant's business at the above date and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Subparagraph 5 of Article 92 of the Air Quality Conservation Act and Article 43 (1) of the same Act;

(b) Defendant A Construction Company: Articles 95, 92 subparag. 5, and 43 subparag. 1 of the Air Quality Conservation Act

1. 50,000 won for each fine to be suspended;

1. Defendant A detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (one hundred thousand won per day) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (in the construction site, the facility with a wheels was installed lawfully, and some vehicles enter the entrance where no facilities with a wheels are installed and enter the entrance to commit the instant crime);