2. The Defendant, as a result of hedging with the victim who was in a relationship with the victim, applied the victim’s pictures that cause a sense of sexual shame in group hosting, sent text messages that cause fears or apprehensions over several times, and up to four times in which the victim’s car was damaged.

Although violence and danger revealed in each of the crimes of this case are very high, the defendant was not yet able to receive a letter from the victim.

Considering these circumstances, it is necessary to punish the defendant strictly.

However, in full view of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the crimes in this case, and against the mistake, the fact that there is no record of punishment due to the same sex crime and the crime of destroying property, the fact that the victim’s photograph appears to have been deleted, and other various sentencing conditions in this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, health conditions, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is deemed to be reasonable, and it is not deemed to be too weak or unreasonable.

Therefore, we do not accept each of the defendant and prosecutor's allegation of unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.