손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the court of first instance.
1. The reasoning for the part concerning the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for a modification or addition of a part as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of
(In full view of all the allegations by the Plaintiff and the evidence additionally submitted to this court, the first instance judgment is reasonable). From the present 10th 3th 10th son of the first instance judgment to the present 19th 10th son of the first instance judgment, the Supreme Court, which is the highest trial, revises the judgment of dismissal of appeal on May 19, 2017 (2017Do4767) to the final and conclusive judgment
The 6th 6th 6th son of the first instance judgment stated that “No evidence exists” was added to “ insofar as the Defendant, using a false tax invoice, obtained a benefit of KRW 112,84,606, value-added tax amounting to KRW 24,735,100, totaling KRW 112,842,70, value-added tax amounting to KRW 36,684,60, additional tax amounting to KRW 7,336,920, and thereby, incurred loss to the Plaintiff. However, as seen earlier, as long as it cannot be recognized to the Defendant as a public offering or aiding and abetting with respect to the instant deception, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.”
2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.