If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 1, 2015, at around 03:45, the Defendant, within the “Cran bar” located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and had a dispute between the owner of the business and the tobacco heart, and had been reported to the effect that “Nice franshed”, the Defendant carried out the Defendant’s work and sent out to the outside by separating the Defendant’s work in order to ascertain the situation where the circumstances of the E of the police box belonging to the Daegu Southern-gu, Police Station D, which called “Nice franshed the fransh,” and expressed the Defendant’s desire to “if the franshed franshed with the franshed fransh, what is, and how franched, franshed.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases E by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (field situations, etc.);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136(1) of the choice of a sentence, and the choice of a fine (it is not good that a person commits a crime during the period of a repeated crime, but it is against the law, and the degree of assault is relatively minor);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;