However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around June 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was aware that the Defendant had no intention or ability to make a subcontract to the victim G and H when the Defendant operated and agreed to make an investment; and (b) D was promoting a joint cemetery development project with a maximum of 20,000 occasions of graveyard construction; (c) the Defendant had a patent right of the Defendant’s patent right to use the Defendant’s patent right to use the graveyard to the maximum of 5,00 days; (d) the Defendant already concluded a new funeral contract with the maximum of 00 million won for the graveyard construction; (e) the Defendant was aware that F would make an investment to the said D, and that D would make an investment to the maximum of 100 million won for the graveyard construction; (e) the Defendant did not intend to make an investment to the maximum of 00 million won for the graveyard construction to the maximum of 100 million won; and (e) the Defendant did not intend to make an investment to the maximum of 100 million won for the graveyard construction to the maximum of 1000 billion won.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with D to obtain a total of KRW 100 million from victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement to I and J (a list 1, 14);

1. Part of the prosecutor’s statement (list 19) with respect to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions (list 9);

1. Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Punishment;