손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from June 1, 2014 to June 22, 2017.
1. The Plaintiff in press reports by the Defendant against the Plaintiff is a person who operates the hospital (hereinafter “instant member”) under the trade name of “D Council member” in Sinpo City C, and the Defendant is a reporter of the weekly newspaper (distribution to 3,000 copies, sporess, sporess, and sporess, sporess, and sporess, sporess, and sporess
The Defendant directly published the article in attached Form 1 (hereinafter referred to as “Class 1 engineer”) in the Fer’s weekly newspaper and online newspaper as “G,” and published the article in attached Form 2 (hereinafter referred to as “Class 2 engineer”) in the Her’s weekly newspaper as “I”.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4-4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the claim for damages
A. Since the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 and the second engineer are false contents and undermine the Plaintiff’s trust and honor, the Defendant is obligated to pay 30 million won as consolation money to the Plaintiff.
B. The facts of recognition 1) around April 2014, the Defendant viewed the Plaintiff as drinking by the J, who was hospitalized in the instant Assembly member, and the Y only listens to the horses, and received information from K, who was found in the instant Council member on May 2014, to the effect that the cost of non-benefit medical expenses would be paid off, which is the president of the hospital. However, the Defendant refused the Plaintiff’s demand to answer if K sent an official document. 2) After that, the Defendant found the L of the Seocho-si Public Health Center and requested the instant Council member to check and check the instant Council member because the cost of medical treatment is excessive.
Accordingly, the Yeongdeungpo-si Public Health Center also conducted a transfer examination to the instant member, but it was confirmed that there was no special error, and thus notified the Defendant of this fact.
Nevertheless, around May 13, 2014, the defendant requested L to examine additional violations of the Medical Service Act against LA, but L has already completed the inspection.