However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No trademark identical with the registered trademark of another person shall be used for goods similar to the designated goods thereof, or any trademark similar to the registered trademark of another person shall be used for goods identical with or similar

Nevertheless, around August 6, 2014, the Defendant posted an overseas name photograph on the Internet medium-sized store “number-place” and a smartphone display room’s smartphone display, advertised to sell the fake foreign name items. On August 6, 2014, around the name in which the Defendant reported and contacted the above opening Internet website, the Defendant sold 1 f3,000 won of a fake bag (trademark No. 0059471) affixed with the trademark on the victim’s urbine urbine eurbine 63,00,000 won from that time to April 6, 2016, 2000 the Defendant’s total sale of the fake items attached with the trademark of an overseas name company, such as the victim’s 2,390,000 won and 80,000 won and 60,000 won and 60,7810,7810,7067,7610,767,767, and 106,7,7,7000.7.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. Investigation report (Evidence No. 9, 10, 11, 17, 22, 28);

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an appraisal request, such as a written opinion on the appraisal of seized articles infringing on intellectual property rights, confirmation of authentic goods for which appraisal is requested, and whether trademark rights are infringed, and the results of the appraisal

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the former Trademark Act (amended by Act No. 14033, Sept. 1, 2016) regarding criminal facts.