A. The lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) against the Defendant and his defense counsel is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected against the defendant, the degree of the defendant's participation in the crime of this case and the profits earned by the defendant are insignificant compared to other accomplices, and there are no records of having been sentenced to the same criminal records or imprisonment without prison labor or more. The crime of this case of Bosing is extremely weak in light of the method of the crime of this case and most of the ordinary people who need the loan, and the damage is extremely poor, and the defendant took part in the crime of this case in order to complete payment, although recognizing that the crime of this case is part of the organization of Bosing crimes, even though he knows that the crime of this case takes part in the crime of this case as part of the organization of Bosing crimes, it is unfavorable to the defendant. In full view of all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relations, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.