If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 22:10 on April 8, 2013, the Defendant opened a TV disclosure office, the Internet, and telephone in the name of the Defendant, and found it on the ground that the said victim did not pay the price, and the demand telephone was avoided without contact even though the contact was not made, and caused damage to the said victim due to an act of damaging the property in need of 325,000 won of the repair cost of the windows, etc., such as booming the fire that had been collected on the window due to the fact that the said victim did not contact, and caused the said victim to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;