야간주거침입절도등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant is aged, the Defendant reflects the crime, and there are relatively little circumstances to consider the damage caused by each of the instant crimes, such as the fact that the damage is insignificant.
However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant, taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are too unreasonable, considering that the defendant intruded into another person's residence at night and stolen property or committed attempted crimes, and the nature of the crime is very poor. The defendant has been sentenced to punishment over 13 times due to the same crime; the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated offense period due to the same kind of crime under several laws.
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.