[2018 Highest 2790] The Defendant was living together with the victim B(25 years of age) for about six months and did not return to him.

On February 21, 2018, at around 06:00, the Defendant suffered injury from the victim, such as a click flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick fl

[2019 Highest 2098] Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, at around 00:20 on Jan. 19, 2019, the Defendant carried 0.1g of Metropha (tentative phone) in the front door of Gangnam-gu Seoul E, Seoul, in vinyl.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 2790]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Inquiries and replies to inquiries;

1. A medical certificate [2019 Highest 2098]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Reports on internal investigation (attaching photographs of seized articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the 2019-H-1196 to the table for appraisal request (2019);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of possession of philophones) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel’s assertion among concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the assertion (2018 Goman 2790 related) was that the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the cage of the cage of the cage of the cage of the cage of the cage of the fage of the fage of the

2. The victim stated that he/she had several faces from the Defendant from the investigative agency to this court, and that he/she suffered from the injury of the cage of the cage cage at the left side on several occasions. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim’s medical record at the first emergency room located in the victim. < Amended by Act No. 15558, Feb. 18, 2018>