양수금
1. The defendant shall not exceed KRW 10,000,000,000, and shall be jointly and severally with the plaintiff, within the limit of KRW 200,000.
1. The facts in the separate sheet of claim as to the cause of the claim may be acknowledged either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the entries in Gap 1 and 8.
Therefore, the defendant is jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 200,000,000 and the amount of KRW 200,000 per annum from April 15, 2008 to the date of full payment, within the limit of KRW 10,000.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. As to the claim for repayment, the defendant asserts that since the debt that he had borne to the foreign exchange bank in question by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. is fully repaid and extinguished, the plaintiff cannot seek payment from the defendant, a joint guarantor of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff, prior to the acquisition by transfer of the loan credit to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the plaintiff, a joint guarantor of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and
B. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s claim for extinctive prescription has expired.
그러나 위 각 증거에 변론 전체의 취지를 더하면, 이 사건 대출채권을 양수한 동양파이낸셜㈜는 이 사건 대출거래약정일인 2003. 10. 28.로부터 상사소멸시효기간인 5년이 지나기 전에 피고에 대한 지급명령을 신청하여 그 지급명령이 2008. 3. 11. 확정된 사실, 동양파이낸셜㈜로부터 피고에 대한 채권을 양수한 원고는 위 지급명령 확정일로부터 10년이 지나기 전인 2018. 2. 26. 이 사건 지급명령을 신청한 사실은 기록상 명백하므로, 원고의 피고에 대한 위 양수금채권은 시효로 소멸하지 않았다.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. The plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendant is justified.