If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant introduced himself/herself as a loan consultant by telephone to the victim C who became aware of at around 17:00 the loan site, and the same year.

5. On 30. 30. 08:20, on the pretext of the fact that it is necessary for the victim to visit the above victim to and enter his own vehicle in the literature park located in 4-dong Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim had the victim obtain a resident registration certificate, a certificate of official approval, and a certificate of income, and let the victim open a mobile phone in the name of the victim.

On May 31, 2017, the Mandong-gu, Seocheon-gu, the Mandong-gu, through the Internet lending brokerage company, had the victim borrow KRW 20 million in the victim's name through the Internet lending brokerage company. The victim made the Defendant withdraw the loans from the agricultural cooperative located in the Nam-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Daejeon-gu and the U.S. in the U.S. 82, and made the Defendant make a false statement that "I will refund the loan instead of leaving the remainder of the loans from the personal loan, excluding the necessary money."

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention to repay part of the loan because he had obtained the loan under the name of the victim and intended to use it for his own fine or living expenses.

The Defendant was given 17.5 million won as a loan repayment from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Fraud of a mobile phone;

A. On May 30, 2017, the Defendant paid the equipment cost and charges to the above victim in G located in F in the Full-Time area of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 30, 2017, by opening the handphone in order to make a loan application, using the handphone in the main place.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay mobile phone costs and charges because he/she received a mobile phone and intended to use it as personal money by selling it to another person.

The defendant.