대여금
1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 50,00,00, Plaintiff B, C, and D respectively, KRW 33,33,333, and each of the above amounts. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26790, Nov. 1, 2015>
No dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including various numbers), F loaned 150,000,000 to the defendant on October 25, 2013 without a contract for interest and due date for payment, and F died on April 25, 2014. Accordingly, it can be recognized that the plaintiff A jointly succeeded to F's property at 3/9, and the plaintiff B, C, and D respectively at 2/9, respectively. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff A the amount of KRW 50,000 (150,000,000 X3/9), KRW 33,3333,333,00,000, KRW 150,000 (150,000,0000, X2/9, and less than 1515,015,000 of the complaint of this case.
Therefore, each claim of the plaintiffs in this case is reasonable, and all of the claims are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.