교통사고처리특례법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is engaged in driving of B digging machines.
On April 22, 2016, the Defendant operated the above digging pool as around 19:25, and had the road front of the village located at the entrance of the village to the village at the 3-lane of the official inspection.
Since there is no central line with concrete packaging, it was a road in front of the village in which there is no central line, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by keeping the left and right well before and after the road situation in response to the road situation.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without looking at the front side of the road, and went to the right side of the victim C (66 years) who was moving to the cat seat of the caton in front of the caton which was parked on the right side of the caton in front of the caton in front of the caton which was parked on the right side of the caton which was parked on the right side of the cat on the road due to that impact, and led to the back side of the caton on the left side of the caton which was parked on the right side of the caton.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the opening of the right-hand body flag, which requires approximately 16 weeks of treatment.
2. Determination:
(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;
B. On August 1, 2016, after the institution of the instant indictment, indication of the victim’s non-existence of punishment
(c) Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Dismissal of public prosecution;