2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

2. The judgment is that the plaintiff prepared and delivered a notarial deed in which the defendant's continuous harassment, coercion, or intimidation as shown in the attached Form has no choice but to have been made and delivered, which is null and void, and the plaintiff's obligation to the defendant does not exist. However, in order to recognize it, it should be acknowledged by evidence that there was the defendant's "voluntary coercion, intimidation, etc." at the time of the preparation of

However, the Plaintiff failed to submit all such evidence.

The plaintiff was scheduled to leave the election of a member of the basic organization in 2014, but the defendant, who became aware of this plan, made the above notarial deed by abusing the situation of the plaintiff who was trying to take part in the plaintiff's candidate office, such as the defendant's finding out in the 2014 office of a member of the National Assembly, and threatening the central party to escape from difficulties, and finding out the plaintiff's candidate office and trying to carry out one person's demonstration. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

Furthermore, the mere fact that a notarial deed was prepared as of May 19, 2014, immediately before the above circumstances and the local election in 2014, is difficult to view that the Defendant was in receipt of a notarial deed by taking advantage of the Plaintiff’s “heat” condition.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff as the losing party.