When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

피고인은 2016. 10. 21. 16:55 경 광주 북구 B 원룸 306호 앞 복도에서, 피고인이 위 306호에서 퇴거 불응을 하고 있다는 신고를 받고 출동한 광주 북부 경찰서 C 지구대 소속 경위 D로부터 귀가할 것을 권유 받자 술에 취해 화가 나 “ 내가 뭘 잘못했어

Before the 112 patrol duty, the 112 patrol duty was fluored by E, etc., the blusium E was blusium E, and the flusium E was blusium E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by contingency.

The defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime.

Unfavorable circumstances: Serious punishment is needed to enhance national confidence in the conduct of obstructing the performance of official duties by police officers in uniform.