However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) (collective, threat) was found to have had a good appraisal while being known to the victim B (the age of 39) and the victim B was living together with the victim C. However, on October 5, 2014, when the victim B was aware of the fact that the victim B was living together with the victim C, the victim was exposed to the victim B at the sports park located behind Samyangyang-dong, Samyang-dong, Samyang-dong, Samyang-dong, Samyang-dong, Samyang-dong, Samyang-dong, and the victim was exposed to the victim, and the victim was exposed to her he was exposed to her, and the victim was exposed to the victim. The victim’s her hick pipe, which is a dangerous object at the bridge of the troke of the Defendant’s possession, and the victim’s hacked the victim by taking out the hick pipe, which is a dangerous object at the bit of the vehicle.

2. On October 6, 2014, the Defendant damaged the property by opening the entrance door in order to comply with the victim’s residence together with the above C in front of the victim’s house located in T on March 6, 2014, but the victim did not open the entrance. However, the Defendant caused the damage to KRW 700,000 of the repair cost by opening the entrance door of the drinking and sprinking door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and C;

1. Application of the statutes governing a written estimate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation to carry dangerous things), Article 36 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (i.e., the fact that the suspension of execution is in conflict with each other, the fact that there is no criminal conviction or more);