2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a trucking business operator who runs a general truck transport business, a special truck transport business, etc. in Kimcheon-si B.

B. The Plaintiff’s representative C forged the notification of the repair of a substitute-use truck in the name of the president of the trucking transport business association issued with the effect that “a substitute-use truck allowed to be supplied shall be scrapped and lent for a general truck.” The Plaintiff’s representative C submitted it to a public official in charge of the Maritime Affairs and Security Office from May 11, 201 to March 23, 2012, and registered each of the special-use truck listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant truck”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "vehicle scrapping of this case". Forgery of private documents and its events: Violation of the Trucking Transport Business Act by forging the notification of alteration of the freight trucking services under the name of the president of the Trucking Transport Business Association of Gyeongbuk-do and the violation of the Trucking Transport Business Act: Operation fraud of trucking transport business with an illegally increased vehicle without permission for alteration: Fraud of trucking transport business by deceiving prospective truck drivers as if they were normal truck number plates, and by deceiving them, by deceiving them.

C. C was charged with fabrication of private documents, uttering of falsified Investigation Documents, Violation of the Trucking Transport Business Act, and fraud, and sentenced to a fine of KRW 8 million on April 10, 2013 ( Daegu District Court Decision 2013Da161), and the said judgment was finalized on April 18, 2013, as follows.

On April 29, 2013, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to restore each of the instant trucks to its original state by May 28, 2013, each of the instant truck with a specific-use type truck, and ordered the Plaintiff to restore it to its original state by not later than June 12, 2013 again on May 30, 2013, but the Plaintiff failed to comply with the order. As such, Article 3 of the Trucking Transport Business Act (hereinafter “ Trucking Transport Business Act”) on July 2, 2013.