Each fraud described in the Decision 2017 Godan5698 Nos. 2 through 26 of the Code of Crime.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s judgment on the crime No. 1 set forth in the 2017 Highest 5698 List of Offenses was reached in the first instance, and the fact that this part of the crime is recognized, and that it is against the Defendant, is favorable to the Defendant.

However, there are the following disadvantageous circumstances for the defendant.

It is reasonable that the amount obtained by the defendant from the victim is KRW 30 million.

The defendant did not agree with the victim.

The defendant committed this part of the crime during the period of suspended execution due to the same crime.

In light of the fact that there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable to consider the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing since the new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the first instance court.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. The judgment on the remaining crimes is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

The most part of this crime is that the defendant committed during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime.

The defendant repeated the crime of fraud against many victims, and the amount of damage exceeds 80 million won.

The defendant did not agree with the victim AK among victims.

In addition, even though the defendant agreed with the victim BY, Y, AH, and BG, the victim BY applied for severe punishment from the court below to the trial court, and from the trial court, the victim Y, AH, and BG applied for severe punishment.

However, there are the following favorable circumstances for the defendant.

The defendant committed the crime against the victim N from the court below.