2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

On May 7, 2017, at around 10:55, the Defendant: (a) inflicted an injury on the part of the victim C (son, 66 years old) who was the previous relationship with the Defendant in front of the E cafeteria operated by the Defendant, and (b) in the process of carrying out demonstration with the victim in order to take away the banner from the defect of demonstration, and in the process of physical fighting with the victim, the Defendant sustained the victim’s left arms, scam, and scam for about 10 days, which require medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. On-site photographs and damaged photographs;

1. The written diagnosis of injury [this part of the charges against the Defendant, but in light of the reasonableness of the witness C’s testimony, the degree of testimony, and the relationship with other evidence, the Defendant’s assertion is not accepted, as it can be found to be facts constituting the crime as indicated in

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 32 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss an application for compensation order (not clear of the scope of liability for compensation);