However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 17, 2013, when the Defendant was under the influence of 0.185% of blood alcohol concentration by services around 18:20, the Defendant was driving Bcoon in the middle of 0.185%, and went through a back road of the old city Do 259-8 Do 2, 259-8 Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 2, and Hyundai Gas Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do, the Defendant did not take measures to prevent traffic congestion and damage to the left-hand side of the victim C Do Do Do Do Do dong Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do dong Do Do Do Do dong Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do .

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim E by negligence in the course of performing the above duties a approximately two-day medical treatment, such as dysium, and dysium, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Written estimate and each written diagnosis;

1. The actual survey report, on-site photographs, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents (the second report), and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on proper initiative of, and reports on the statement of status of, a prime driver;

1. Relevant Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of a measure that was not taken after the destruction and damage of things) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment,