beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.15 2013고단1160

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The prosecutor's office of Suwon District Court Nos. 1 to 8 from the defendant is 2013 pressure.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 27, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for larceny, etc. on August 27, 2004, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 2004, by violating the Act on the Protection, etc. of Victims of Sexual Crimes (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.) and larceny (special robbery, etc.) at the Seoul High Court, on December 10, 2004, the said suspended sentence became null and void. On May 7, 2009, the said sentence was being executed, and one year and six months were sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment, etc. of Violence Act (a deadly weapon, etc., injury by a deadly weapon, etc.) in the Daegu District Court’s sexual support and on October 25, 2012, the theft force was more than six times more.

Around 02:00 on February 15, 2013, the Defendant habitually accessed “D” restaurants in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, with a printed tag, “civil safety personnel” attached to “D,” and accessed E under the influence of alcohol as if he was a citizen autonomous defense agent, and followed the victim’s house in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and followed the victim’s house. At around 03:30 on February 15, 2013, the Defendant entered the victim’s cell phone at around 03:30 on March 13, 2013, as well as the Defendant’s 30,000 won on March 13, 2013, on the market price of the victim’s house, which was in the victim’s house, and was in the victim’s house, and entered the victim’s cell phone at around 03:30 on the same day.

"2013 Highest 1420"

1. On February 3, 2013, around 11:33, the Defendant: (a) performed as if he had a legitimate right to use a private villagen, I’s credit card and physical check in Ansan-si G; and (b) held that, if the net gold 10 money was paid to the victim J. who is an employee, the Defendant would normally settle the price by using the card.

However, the above card was stolen from the above I, and the defendant is entitled to use the card.