However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 5, 2020, the Defendant interfered with business is a member of the Domo E, which is operated by the victim C (the age of 53, women) in Jung-Eup (the age of 53).

At around 14:20 on June 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) found the victim C, running at the Domototobbbbb, which was operated by the victim C, and demanded the victim to have the Handphone charging at the 1st floor; (b) however, the Defendant, who was demanded by the victim, to have the passenger room filling and set off the room, expressed the victim’s desire with the large interest called “A frib f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

2. The Defendant: (a) committed an assault upon the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) at the time and on the part of the head of the Dong-Eup Police Station F Zone G and the head of the police station, who was called out after receiving a report from C, to attempt to keep the said C out of the train although G and the head of the police station gave a petition to himself and gave guidance to the guest room; and (b) subsequently, the Defendant took a bath to “Choe and meat” and used the said H’s coin to commit assault.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and H;

1. A report on internal investigation (on-site conditions at the time of dispatch of the report);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The extent of damage caused by sentencing, the degree of damage not repaid, and the defendant's fine twice as a drunk driving, under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 44-2 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act;