공무집행방해
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the penalty (three million won of a fine) declared by the court below against the defendant is too unfilled.
2. The judgment committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had been punished for the same crime, and the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the relevant police; however, the Defendant appears to have led to the instant crime by cultivating knee and knee, etc. in the process of arresting the Defendant as an offender in the crime of insult; the Defendant’s same history is eight years prior to the pronouncement of the judgment below; there are no special circumstances or changes that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the judgment below; and other circumstances, including the degree of damage inflicted by the pertinent police, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and the records of the instant case, are considered appropriate.
Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.