except that the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years after the judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 27, 2019, the Defendant operated the Victim D parking lot operated by the Victim D, Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, on February 03:0, 2019, and operated a dangerous EKan-si car, which is a victim's property and parked at that place two times to go through Fchin-don-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn, which is the victim's possession, and thereby, caused the said Han-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn car and the H-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-W

The defendant continued to drive the above Kan-kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's office, outer wall, office kn't.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles and damaged the victim to have a total of KRW 24,19,00,000, including KRW 9,514,00 and KRW 14,685,00,00 for office repair expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV image report);

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Article 369 (1) or 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Articles 369 (1) or 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the decision of types] the scope of repeated offenses and special damage [the category 1] the basic area of repeated offenses and special damage [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] [the scope of recommendations], the crime method of sentencing in June through January 12 is dangerous, the economic damage suffered by the victim is relatively large, the recovery of damage has not been made up until now, the defendant shows the appearance of the crime against the probation, and there has not been any punishment more than suspended execution, and the defendant's age, family, occupation, environment, etc. shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of various sentencing factors, such as the defendant's age, family, and environment.