1. On December 201, 201, the Defendant against the victim C: “The victim C would pay KRW 15 million of the cost of construction on the face of a stone construction project during the extension of a shopping mall located in Gasan-si D.” to the victim C.

However, the Defendant: (a) had no other property; (b) caused additional construction cost due to the erroneous determination of construction cost; and (c) did not have the ability to pay all the construction cost even if the victim completed the construction work; and (d) had the victim deceptioned, as above, and had the victim complete the tin construction work on March 2012; and (b) had the victim acquire property benefits equivalent to the same amount because the victim did not pay five million won the construction cost to the victim during the police officer on March 2012; and (c) from then on April 2012, the Defendant got the victim by deceiving the victim over five times, as shown in the list of crimes, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to KRW 51,80,000,000 in cash from the victim.

2. Around February 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E stated that “The victim E will pay KRW 8.5 million for the construction cost on the face of the main studio construction work by conducting painting work among the studio construction work” to the victim E at the site of the studio construction work in Asia-si.

However, even though the victim was unable to pay the construction cost even if the seal construction work was completed, because the studio construction work did not have any other property, and there was no additional construction cost due to the change of the design, etc., the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount because the victim did not pay KRW 8.5 million to the victim even if the seal construction work was completed on May 2012.

3. The criminal defendant against the victim G is guilty;

(a) On March 2012, 2012, at the front of the convenience store in ASEAN, the victim G “the studio F in ASEAN”; and