However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 31, 2018, at the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) caused a fluence by drinking alcohol, such as intending to fluorize a fluence to drinking alcohol, and (b) reported on 112, and notified the police officer E belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station D District of the notification of the disposition as an act of disturbance of drinking alcohol by drinking alcohol; (c) took a bath to the above E; and (d) took the fluor by putting the fluor of the E’s arms by hand, and fluoring and fluoring the e head debt by hand.

As such, the Defendant assaulted police officers E to interfere with legitimate performance of duties concerning investigation and prevention of crimes, maintenance of order, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the criminal records of crimes punishable by obstruction of duties and damage to property have been significantly high, but the degree of assault

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;