However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On May 17, 2019, the Defendant is the driver of the vehicle B, and driving the above vehicle around 23:05 on May 17, 2019, the Defendant proceeded with the view to D from C to D.

At night, there was a vehicle that stops in red signal on the front side, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to look at the front side and the left side, and to accurately operate the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, caused the victim E(the 57-year-old driver) to drive the back-paner of the vehicle drivinged by the Defendant with the rear-paner of the victim E(the 57-year-old taxi) drive, and caused the said taxi to have the back-paner of the victim G(the 29-year-old driver) driving HT-H car, which stops in front due to the shock.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc.; (b) on the victim I (the 44-year-old) who was on the top of the said taxi; (c) on the part of the victim J (the 20-year-old age-old) who was on the back of the said taxi in need of approximately two weeks of treatment; (d) on the part of the victim J (the 20-year-old age-old) who was on the part of the said cab in need of approximately two weeks of treatment; (d) on the part of the victim G operating the said Y-type car, the injury such as light dump, tension, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment; (d) on the part of the head of the said Y-ri car; (e) on the part of the victim K (the 26-year-old-old passenger car; (e) on the part of the victim’s 5-day-old taxi; and (e) on the back part of the said 25-day-day-day-old taxi.