Seized evidence No. 14 shall be confiscated.

The Defendant, as a person without a certain occupation, had been in contact with the “outline Mebrotop (the method on the side of the driver’s seat of the knit vehicle corrected by using the upper end)” in the Internet community tubes (youtline Mebroe) specializing in Internet dynamic images, with a view to cutting off goods from another person’s vehicle using the above water system.

On January 1, 2015, the Defendant discovered and prepared for the Eknif vehicle owned by the victim D in front of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 01:00 to 03:00, one day from the day he prepared in advance to put it into the key hole of the above vehicle's driving seat, and removed the correction device by the above-mentioned method, and then, at least 1,000 won of the victim's market price in the above vehicle's possession, one mlife 1,000 won (1:0,000 won) other than Samsung C, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000 to KRW 1,50,000,000,000 won, or 1,63,000,000 won of the total market price from around the 1,50,000 won, and 166,000,000 won of the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, D,O, P, and Q;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographss and photographs of each damaged vehicle by capturing each CCTV image;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed several times systematically and repeatedly;

1. Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 32, 329, and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (including attached papers).