If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 11, 2017, at around 22:10, Kimhae-si B “C” restaurant, the Defendant reported 112 on the fact that he was unable to receive the said restaurant at the front of the above restaurant, on the grounds of the transfer value, and that police officers belonging to the 112 reported the 112 report, but called out after receiving the 112 report, did not resolve it on the ground that the police officers belonging to the Do police station did not address it on the ground that the police officers belonging to the Do police station did not control the Defendant’s behavior to prevent him from returning home to the above restaurant, on the ground that he did not stop the Defendant’s behavior to prevent him from returning home to the above restaurant, on around three occasions, and he abandons his duties to the above E.

씨 발 놈 아, 얼마 받아 쳐 먹었 노, 이거 해결해 줄 때까지 절대 못 간다, 개새끼야 오늘 갈 때까지 가보자 개 자슥아, 내가 너 거 가만 안 둔다 ”라고 욕설하면서 손으로 피해자가 입고 있는 조끼를 잡아당기고, 주먹으로 위 E를 때릴 듯한 행동을 하였다.

The defendant continued to dismiss the above E in the course of arresting a flagrant offender due to the obstruction of the performance of official duties in relation to the above act.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant (including three times and part concerning the examination of the suspect);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (15th, 35th of documentary evidence);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is that the Defendant assaulted a police officer who was dispatched to a cafeteria with his own 112 report at the expense of the proprietor of the restaurant and the Scison money and interfered with the performance of official duties. Thus, the nature of the offense is not good in light of the details, method, mode, etc.

However, the defendant reflects his fault in depth.

Any police officer dispatched shall last.