However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 08:30 on August 5, 2015, the Defendant listened to the statement that the Defendant might be arrested as a crime of insult when she takes a bath from F, a police official belonging to the Seoul Songpa Police Station E District, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that there was drinking value in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and caused F to face a son by “I amb. I am amb. I am amb. I am amb. I am amb. I amb. I amb. I am amb. I amb. I am amb. I amb. I am amb. I am amb. I am amb. I am amb.” The head am am more than three times, and the amb. F amb. amb. was tightly sealed once, and the ambur f's chest was tightly sealed by F, and the am.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing violence victim photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that he/she reflects the fact of a fine, that he/she has a previous offense before a fine is imposed, that it is difficult to see the result of damage as severe, that he/she deposited one million won for a police officer, etc.

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;