2. The nature of each of the crimes in this case, in light of the content and circumstances of each of the crimes in this case, the negligence of the defendant, the degree of injury inflicted on the victim, etc.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake; (b) the Defendant escaped at the scene of the accident; (c) was committed against the police officer, leaving him to the scene in several sections; (d) the Defendant acquired the driver’s license after having been driving practice on the road in the apartment complex for the purpose of acquiring the driver’s license at the time of the instant accident; (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim in the trial process in the lower court; (d) the Defendant did not have any criminal record; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, and circumstances after the crime; and (e) various sentencing conditions indicated in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.