상해등
The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,00,00 for the crime of April, 200, and 3 of the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest 1010"
1. Injury;
A. On June 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in August, 2015, on the grounds of a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (motor vehicle drivers’ assault, etc.) at the Suwon Flag method Board, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2015.
B. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on April 22, 2015, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that the victim D(44 years of age) of the victim D(hereinafter referred to as C) of the victim D(44 years of age) 113 paid the drinking value; (c) the victim again demanded the drinking value; (d) on the ground that the victim again demanded the drinking value.
“The victim’s chest was debrised with both hands, pushed the victim’s chest, boomed the bat, batd several times, and batled on his hand, thereby causing injury to the victim’s left part, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
"2015 Highest 2714"
2. On July 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was sent from the “G hotel” located in the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “G hotel,” to the victim H, the Defendant, as a guest room in which he/she was able to sleep by administering a vegetable, I, the birth of which he/she was frighted to the victim H.
Although the above I changed, it is impossible to open a door to the guest room on the ground that it is not possible to confirm whether Defendant 1 was a member of the phone because he did not receive a telephone, and therefore, it cannot open the guest room. Although the above H does not regulate it, it does not leave the stairs in the above hotel as a large interest, it is difficult to see why “I am, Chewing gue, and I am fright to live and live together.”
For about 2 hours and 30 minutes, “the victim’s hotel business was obstructed by force, such as taking a bath,” and thereby obstructing the victim’s hotel business.
3. The Defendant: (a) heard the statement of the victim K in the process of having been dispatched to the said hotel after receiving a report of 112 at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) demanded the Defendant to return home because it could interfere with the Defendant’s business; and (c) many and unspecified customers.