On March 2013, the Defendant, at the 6th floor office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul F building in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, had been aware of around that time, “A city greatly operated shopping mall in China, I and I, the president of H, and the J president, who is separate from I and I, has well known.

K Co., Ltd. (K; hereinafter referred to as "K"), a subsidiary company of H, may pay a KRW KRW 00 million per month when carrying out a tumum project, which is a kind of tack game, at L casino operated by K (K; hereinafter referred to as "K").

In order to pay KRW 200,000 as the honorarium for business inducement, it would be possible to have the I president attend the I president through the J Chairperson so that the I president can be accompanied by the above business rights.

First of all, since money can be carried out well well, it is called 30 million won in down payment first, it is called 30 million won in order to give priority to others, and it is called 'the so-called Guro Fund', and the same year.

4. 9. He was granted KRW 30 million in cash from the victims of the N golf-practice parking lot located in the Sung-gu, Sung-nam-si, Sung-si, Sung-gu, Sung-si, G, as part of the street funds.

Since then, on the 17th day of the same month, the Defendant’s phone calls to the victim and “a person who intends to obtain an exhumation project right while giving more than the party funds,” and the remainder of the money may go beyond the different business rights.

The inside of the Republic of Korea calls for the payment of the remainder of 170,000,000 won and then prepares for the remainder of 170,000,000 won, so that the Republic of Korea may negotiate with K (ju) in advance, and may carry out exhumation projects from the beginning of May, and then demand the payment of the remainder of the street by demanding the payment of the remainder. On the 30th day of the same month, the victim was given a cash of 170,000,000 won from the victim of the said F building as the remainder of the street loans.

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the injured party, the defendant has no intention or ability to use the said money as a street, or to obtain the said business license from HK to obtain the said business license. Therefore, the defendant did not have any specific work with HK, so that he may obtain the said business license for the injured party and make profits therefrom.