However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A’s crime;

A. A. Around June 12, 2013, the fraud Defendant stated to the victim D, “E provides No. NAS car as security, and lend money to the victim KRW 15 million.” The Defendant borrowed money within two months.

그러나 사실 피고인은 E에게 피해자와의 중고차 대부를 중개함에 있어 E으로부터 대부금액 1,000만 원을 요청받았을 뿐이고, 추가금액인 500만 원은 피고인이 중간에서 가로챌 생각이었다.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 15 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account of F, and acquired KRW 5 million from among them.

B. Around May 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided the said victim with a vehicle number of the Plaintiff owned by H as a security; and (b) mediated the loan of KRW 5 million to H; (c) around July 2013, 2013, the Defendant 5 million was placed in custody for the victim under the pretext of full payment to the victim from H; (d) around that time, the Defendant embezzled it for personal use for the victim; (b) around that time, on June 25, 2013, the Defendant: (c) on the street of the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, and the 113-dong, Jeju apartment; (d) provided the said victim with a vehicle number of the Plaintiff as security; and (e) provided a loan of KRW 3 million under the name of the said victim with a loan of KRW 3 million under the name of the said victim; and (e) provided the said victim with a loan of KRW 3 million under the name of the said victim.

2. Defendant B’s crime

A. When the Defendant purchases a valuable vehicle with J as a discount between J, the Defendant would acquire money by means of borrowing money from the money as security.