When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 1, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court on December 1, 2007, and on April 6, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court on April 6, 201.

On December 21, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.053% during blood transfusion around 22:05, and was driving B from the section of approximately 2 km from the front of a restaurant in the name of the Seo-gu Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu to the front of the same Gu forest static Gambridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under the liquor:

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of statutes by inquiring about three copies of a summary order and criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s error is against his/her own fault; (b) the Defendant applied for the personal rehabilitation and obtained a decision to authorize the repayment plan (the Daejeon District Court 2016 Daejeon District Court 10089, 10089, hereinafter referred to as the Daejeon District Court 2016, ); (c) the Defendant’s wife appears to have faithfully repaid his/her repayment; (d) the Defendant’s wife is leading the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s wife supports his/her wife and his/her three children; and