2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant is the executor of the sales business of the instant shopping complex (hereinafter “instant apartment”) in the Simsan-si apartment complex (hereinafter “instant apartment complex”), and the Plaintiffs are the persons who either sold the instant shopping complex from the Defendant or acquired the status from the buyer.

B. On April 7, 2017, the Defendant obtained approval for the public announcement of the invitation of 17 stores of the instant shopping districts pursuant to Article 62 of the Rules on Housing Supply, and around that time, published the public announcement and the advertisement for sale of the instant shopping districts.

30, A20, A20, A20, A20, A20, A20, 200, A20, 200, 200, 200, 300,000, 310,000, 227,000, 22700, 280, 300, 280, 300, 200, 200, 200, 200, 300, 200, 200, 207, 200, 300, 200, 1710, 60, 200, 200, 200, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 200, 200, 160, 160, 209

C. On April 18, 2017, the Defendant conducted the bidding for the instant commercial building (hereinafter “instant bidding”). On April 19, 2017, the Defendant concluded a sales contract with the successful bidder whose highest bidding price was stated among the bidders, including Plaintiff A, C, and F. On April 19, 2017, the sales contract was concluded between the successful bidder and some of the buyers, who received the sales right premium from the rest of the Plaintiffs other than Plaintiff A, C, and F, and transferred the right to sell the instant commercial building to the rest of the Plaintiffs.