Defendant

A, when the above victim convened an extraordinary general meeting to elect the president of the center for older persons, a victim misunderstanding that the victim embezzled public funds although he/she did not have embezzled public funds, and then prepared a printed article (A4 paper 1) stating that the victim embezzled public funds in advance at the above general meeting and the victim embezzled 3.24,00 won of public funds.

At around 14:00 on November 14, 2017, the Defendants continued to be present with approximately 20 to 30 members of the above senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center in the senior citizens' center, and Defendant B

As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victim. Since the victim and the defendant voluntarily agreed with the Defendants after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim withdrawn the intent to punish the Defendants (see the withdrawal of the complaint from December 28, 2018). Accordingly, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.