However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 22:50 on February 23, 2013, the Defendant assaulted “C” restaurant in the Daegu Seogu, Daegu, on the ground that the victim D (27 years of age) did not spread a false complaint against Pyeongtaek-gu, the Defendant and the Defendant’s female-friendly E, and that he was influenced with the victim’s front part of the materials dangerous to the victim who was seated on the above restaurant table, and was influenced twice for the victim’s face. The victim’s face was satisfed twice by drinking, satfing the victim’s bat, satch, and the victim’s face was satisfed, and 1-2 times again, the victim’s face was satched.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to D

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;