If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark shall be used for goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with each other from May 10, 2016 to January 19, 2017, with no legitimate authority. 1. C:

2. D) 및 카카오 스토리 (ID : E, 웹 주소 : F)에 별지 범죄 일람표 (1), (2) 기 재와 같이 ‘ 샤넬’ 이 대한민국 특허청에 등록한 상표와 동일 또는 유사한 상표를 부착 또는 도용한 가짜 샤넬 팔찌 등 위조상품 12점 ( 정품 가 : 13,995,000원) 을 판매목적으로 게시하고, 카카오 톡 (ID : G, H, I) 을 통해 가짜 샤넬 가방 등 총 468점을 판매( 정품 가 : 1,031,245,500원) 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to infringe on the trademark right of the said merchandise coupon holder as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the Defendants

1. An appraisal statement, the register of trademark registration, the investigation report (if any, the confirmation of the provisional calculation of the fixed goods);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on false procurement, a copy of a Kakaotof course, a copy of a Kakaotof course, a copy of a closure, a sales record of counterfeit products, each financial account transaction record, investigation report (sale details and account details) and a suspect 1 and 2 Kakao Stockholm conversation.

1. Relevant Article 230 of the Trademark Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;